His story points to how the Olympia community came together
to support Morningside. I tell local business
owners and friends how fortunate we are to live in a community that is so
supportive and accepting.
Thursday, October 31, 2013
50th Anniversary Luncheon a Superb Celebration
We held a 50th celebration event at Indian Summer
Golf and Country Club yesterday and it was a very positive event. George Le Masurier was our emcee for the
event and did a masterful job of introducing Ralph Munro. Ralph was honored for his contribution to
assisting individuals with disabilities not only at Morningside but throughout
the entire state. Ralph was a former
Morningside board member recounted his experience in raising funds for our
building on Ethel Street. He told of Percy Bean tearing up a $200 check
and told to meet with the woman who gave it to Ralph, Al Brooks and Jerry
Buzzard and say she needs to contribute more money. She thought about it for a minute and wrote a
check for $500. Up to that point in the
local fundraising effort a very small portion of the $15,000 match money was
raised so every dollar was valuable.
Well they raised the match and the rest was history.
Thursday, October 3, 2013
Hidden Disablity Quandary
In September my friend Sara shared the article link below on Facebook
from the New York Times. Sara is a
wonderful woman who lives and works in a very supportive community in
Chicago. Sara also happens to have a
disability labeled Epilepsy. Sara
confided that she does not reveal her disability when hired but only after she
is offered the job does she talk with the employer about limitations she
has. It certainly flies in the face of
the ADA (Americans with Disability Act) which says that a person must not be
discriminated against if they can do the job with reasonable accommodations.
I often speculate if we can lump employer fear, doubt, preconceived bias as a “reasonable accommodation” to take into account when hiring an individual with a disability? Will we ever overcome this fear?
I often speculate if we can lump employer fear, doubt, preconceived bias as a “reasonable accommodation” to take into account when hiring an individual with a disability? Will we ever overcome this fear?
Yesterday I had the opportunity to present the Office of
Governor Inslee with an Outstanding Employer award from our state association
Community Employment Alliance (CEA). We
nominated the Governor’s office because of how supportive they are and how they
have included our client in their family.
The Governor’s Office was one of approximately 15-20 employers receiving
such an award. What I heard repeatedly
from this throng of employers was how positive the experience was even when
they were doubtful at first to hire an individual with a developmental
disability. I wish I could bottle all
the positive statements up and when someone expresses doubt unscrew the lid
and unleash a little bit of this enthusiasm to convince the skeptic to just try
it.
Unfortunately most of the clients we serve do not wish to
disclose their disability – they have had too many experiences whereby someone
has immediately closed the door before it could be opened.
Here is a link to the article: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/22/business/quandary-of-hidden-disabilities-conceal-or-reveal.html?pagewanted=2&_r=2
Tuesday, July 2, 2013
The Conversation Heats Up!
Recently the NBC news program Rock Center with Brian Williams aired a story about the Fair Labor
and Standards Act (FLSA) 14 C provision that allows individuals with
disabilities to earn less than the federal minimum wage. The story focused on Goodwill Industries
International and their use of the provision to pay individuals with
disabilities as little as $ .22 per hour while top executives in the
organization make hundreds of thousands of dollars a year. This story isn’t new but it has now garnered
a wider national audience.
For the past several years disability advocacy groups
have been pushing for the repeal of the FLSA 14 C provision. The leading professional group APSE (Association
of People Supporting Employment First), of which we are a member, strongly
supports its repeal. Organizations that
want to keep the legislation, such as Goodwill, operate sheltered
workshops. This may be why NBC’s
coverage was directed at Goodwill. But Goodwill
is not alone. Other groups such as NISH (soon
to be known as Source America) have also tried to squelch the chatter since sheltered
workshops are the primary vocational service delivery system in the United
States for individuals with developmental disabilities. I am proud to interject that this isn’t the
case in Washington State as I have previously discussed in this blog. Morningside not only closed our sheltered
workshop years ago but we are leading the pack when it comes to finding jobs
for individuals with significant disabilities in community jobs.
In the interest of full disclosure, we are also an authorized
employer under the FLSA 14 C provision and we have a small NISH contract with
the Federal government managed out of our Port Angeles office. However, the difference is that we have made
the affirmative decision not renew our Federal Special Wage Certificate when it
expires in early 2015. We base this
decision on our belief that people with disabilities have the right and ability
to work in the same jobs earning the same wages as nondisabled workers.
The heart of the matter is justice. We believe that section 14(c) is wrong. What is fair, what is right is that
individuals should be working in regular jobs in the community. APSE states it very well: Section
14 C sets low expectations and encourages a misguided sense of the capacities
of individuals with disabilities, who could succeed in integrated work settings
with the appropriate assistance and supports. Current research-based best
practice indicates that the vast majority of individuals with disabilities who
want to work can be found a competitive position at regular wages through the
use of customized and supported employment strategies. Sub-minimum wage is at
odds with national disability policy (particularly the Americans with
Disabilities Act and IDEA), which have made it clear that public policies
should view disability as a natural part of human experience that in no way limits
a person’s right to fully participate in all aspects of life.
We don’t want to limit anyone from achieving their dream
of working in the community so let’s work to end this practice!
To view the Rock Center story click on this link: http://www.nbcnews.com/video/rock-center/52280748#52280748
Thursday, June 27, 2013
Important Law Suit
“Federal jury in Iowa awards $240 million to the 32 mentally
disabled adults” was the headline from the Des Moines Register a few months
ago.
The bunkhouse was a 106 year-old cockroach infested, unheated abandoned school converted to a bunkhouse that had boarded up windows and a cracked foundations. The residents paid $600 per month in rent for use of the tax-free bunkhouse.
The award was the result of a case against Henry’s Turkey
Service. The case highlighted the abuse
that this company did toward individuals with disabilities and as a result of
this abuse once again sparked conversation about the relevancy of the Fair Labor
and Standards Act 14 ( C ) program.
The National Disability Rights Network, is the nonprofit
membership organization for the Protection and Advocacy System for Individuals
with disabilities produced a paper “Segregated and Exploited – A call to
Action!” that used as a case study the atrocities that occurred at Henry’s
Turkey Service in Atalissa, Iowa. The
story of the workers at Henry’s Turkey Service, a meat processing plant in Iowa,
is an appalling example of the abuse that can happen when workers with
disabilities are segregated and sheltered away from others. Henry’s “shipped in” 60 men from Texas where
they worked and lived in the company run bunkhouse. Henry’s paid them an average of $.41 an hour
and the individuals also had to pay for their room and board at the bunkhouse –
leaving them with only $65 at the end of the month. The bunkhouse was a 106 year-old cockroach infested, unheated abandoned school converted to a bunkhouse that had boarded up windows and a cracked foundations. The residents paid $600 per month in rent for use of the tax-free bunkhouse.
A federal jury ruled that Henry’s Turkey Service
violated the Americans with Disabilities Act when they paid 32 mentally
disabled workers only $65 per month for their full time work on the turkey
processing line.
"I'm very
pleased the jury made such a powerful statement," said Ruby Moore, a
national disability rights advocate based in Georgia. "People around the
country are absolutely aware of this case. It has unveiled some of the horrendous
practices faced by people with disabilities."
The National Disability Rights Network made a series of
policy recommendations included in their position paper.
What I think was the take-away was their conclusion. It reads:
“Many people working in support of segregated and sheltered
work don’t think there is another way. In fact, there is. Thirty years ago no
one believed there was another option for people with disabilities but to live
in large, state-run institutions. The belief was they could never care for
themselves; they were too vulnerable or made people too uncomfortable to live
among people without disabilities. But soon we saw these human warehouses for
what they were and in state after state institutions closed, and now millions
of people with disabilities are living, successfully, in their communities.
They evolved and adapted and showed us they are more than we believed, as did
the rest of the country who recognized the value of having friends and
neighbors with disabilities. We witnessed lives changing.
The same can happen in the workplace. Sheltered workshops
are just another institution segregating our neighbors away because of our
unwillingness to accept that our own preconceived ideas about the workplace
might be wrong. It’s time to do things differently.”
Well we agree. It is time that we in this nation examine the practice of sheltered employment and paying below the minimum wage.
We believe everyone should be working in the community.
Wednesday, May 15, 2013
No Stinkin' Handout Please!
I know I’ve mentioned my son, Andrew, in my blog
before. Andrew is a 17 year old junior
in high school and a person with a disability – he is missing his left
arm. Andrew has taught me so much about
the determination of someone who has physical challenges. He simply does not let it get in the way of living
an exciting and extremely fulfilling life.
A couple of weeks ago at his high school advisory meeting,
Andrew and I met with his advisor to review plans for his upcoming senior
year. Andrew has signed up for New
Market Skills Center’s Culinary Program.
New Market is a consortium of several school districts through ESD 113
to teach a variety of skills to high school students ranging from Alternative
Energy Technology to Pre-Veterinary Technician training. Andrew chose Culinary Arts since he has had a
dream for a few years of becoming a chef.
So he signed up for the program.
In my opinion Andrew’s love of food comes more from the consumption not
necessarily the creation or preparation of it!
But he does love to demonstrate to me how he has learned to flip food in
a skillet with the flick of his wrist after watching his favorite chefs on the
Food Network. While he was out of the room
I asked his advisor if she thought this was a good move for Andrew. She pointed out that Andrew is amazing and if
anyone could be a chef with only one arm it would be him. Still I must admit I have my doubts about his
ability to do the job. I am not going to
rain on his parade but I have talked to him about a Plan B. Frankly I think he would be really good in
marketing or sales. I have seen him coax
money from some pretty challenging people.
He was the only one of our four kids who consistently scoured the
neighborhood for annual school or sports fund drives.
He and I didn’t talk much about this meeting
afterward. However Andrew is taking drivers’
education and he takes advantage of any chance to practice driving with
me. I enjoy the company and quite frankly
it gives me a choice opportunity to talk with him about things that we normally
wouldn’t talk about. I am a firm
believer that a parent must use all tools available to them to connect with
their kids.
I didn’t talk to him about becoming a chef but thought
post high school planning was a good subject.
In the past Andrew has indicated he wanted to go to South Puget Sound
Community College to attend their culinary program then to Le Cordon Bleu's
Seattle program rounding out his education in the culinary arts.
I mentioned to him that he needs to make application to
DVR (Division of Vocational Rehabilitation) this fall when he turns 18. Of course he didn’t know what I was even
talking about so I explained that this was a federally funded program that
assists individuals with disabilities in determining their career and then
offering training and placement to make their vocational dream a reality. His
response was quick. He stated he was proud and didn’t need any handout. I think his exact sentence was “I don’t need
no stink’in handout”. He was incredulous
at the thought that throughout his whole life he had fought to not make his
disability a way to gain advantage or favor and now his Dad was suggesting he
take something for free, a handout in his mind, which indicated he was some
“poor handicapped person” with his cup
out asking for a donation.
This young man often surprises me with his insight and
views. I am so proud of his
determination and drive. I admire his
determination and desire to be "normal" and not viewed as a poor
person taking handouts with palm extended.
I am also amazed he doesn’t want to take advantage of a program I am so
familiar with and have seen so many people have realize their dream through
this amazing program. But we have many
more drives before he gets his license which will afford me more opportunities to
continue the conversation.
The real question that
remains is if members of the younger disability community through integrated
schools, programs etc. don’t view themselves as a “special needs” population
then how do we reach out and connect with them as they graduate? Have we reached, or are we reaching, the next
stage where our society is fully integrated to the point we won't need any
affirmative programs to help those who for so many years have been
excluded? Unfortunately, at present at
least, employment statistics don’t bear this out.
Friday, April 5, 2013
U.S. Department of Justice Joins Lawsuit Against State of Oregon
It amazes me how people, programs, things develop. There are whole disciplines that study both
organizational and human development and still it's confusing. What confounds me is how differently things can
develop even when they are in close proximity.
If you heard my sister and me share stories from our childhood you would
undoubtedly think we grew up in different families! I am taken aback that Washington and Oregon
are so vastly different in our approach to individuals with disabilities
working in integrated jobs in the community.
So different that it was announced at a news conference Monday the U.S.
Department of Justice has joined a class-action lawsuit filed last year by people
with disabilities against Gov. John Kitzhaber and the State of Oregon. The suit demands changes to the sheltered
workshop system in Oregon. Conversely, Washington
is by far the national leader ensuring individuals who are developmentally
disabled are working in jobs in the community. (See post on Wednesday, May 9, 2012).
How can it be that one state is getting sued by the Federal Government for providing sheltered services with no choice and the state that shares its border, economy, and lifestyle is receiving acclaim for individuals working in the community with a broad array of choices? I believe the difference is focus. My Uncle Art, who worked in the Washington DVR system, always told his staff to “keep your eye on the client”. His sage words were passed on down through the system and heeded by most. Fixing our focus on the person and what they want to do means not losing sight of the goal. Indeed, in my opinion, this is the key.
How can it be that one state is getting sued by the Federal Government for providing sheltered services with no choice and the state that shares its border, economy, and lifestyle is receiving acclaim for individuals working in the community with a broad array of choices? I believe the difference is focus. My Uncle Art, who worked in the Washington DVR system, always told his staff to “keep your eye on the client”. His sage words were passed on down through the system and heeded by most. Fixing our focus on the person and what they want to do means not losing sight of the goal. Indeed, in my opinion, this is the key.
What I appreciate about Morningside staff is that they do focus
on the person with a disability - each and every day. That is why we closed our sheltered workshop because
by an overwhelming majority our clients wanted to work in the community. Focus is also why we enjoy the position of being
the best in the state at serving our clients in jobs in the community, even
those who require the most support.
When I have the opportunity to meet with clients at their
job or event I am always so pleased to hear how much the job means to them. The conversation is so much more positive and,
well, normal. When I visit a worksite to
award an employer our Outstanding Employer Award, there is such a definite
sense of pride, accomplishment and self-worth as I congratulate the employee on
a job well done!
If indeed a person with a disability in a sheltered workshop
has not been exposed to another work environment it is incumbent upon us, the
professionals, to assist them in seeing the possibilities away from their
current environment and integrated with their neighbors and fellow citizens. Frankly, the support, connection, and interaction
are much more positive in a community job than a sheltered workshop job – and I
know this from experience.
So the solution that may sound too simplistic is rather
simple “keep your eye on the client” to ensure they have the same opportunities
as everyone else.
For more information on the lawsuit here is an article in The
Oregonian:
Wednesday, April 3, 2013
"A 'Good Enough' Dad and His Special Son"
My radio
listening habit is what I would call rather eclectic and the genre largely depends
upon the time of day and what I am doing.
In the morning I wake up to NPR and on Friday they broadcast a story
that has been recorded for StoryCorps, a short vignette, typically a family or
friend talking to each other recounting life experiences. A couple of weeks ago I heard this story and
it moved me. I could identify myself in
this conversation from various viewpoints; from a father with a son who has a
disability, from the viewpoint a son going off to college for the first time
and as a person who has worked with individuals with disabilities for many
years now. This story is very typical of
many of the individuals we have the pleasure of working with each day.
I hope you enjoy this as much as I did.
This is a story
about a restaurant called Tim's Place in Albuquerque, New Mexico. It's named
after Tim Harris, a young man with Down syndrome who started the business in
2010 with help from his dad, Keith.
http://www.npr.org/2013/03/15/174328613/a-good-enough-dad-and-his-special-sonI hope you enjoy this as much as I did.
Tuesday, February 26, 2013
How connected am I?
I am fairly certain that most of us at one time or another
think we have a good grasp of the situation or feel we are connected or we may
even think we have talent but then our shortcoming is pointed out either rather
abruptly, rudely or through closer self-reflection. I am stunned by the musically challenged
people that think they can sing and appear on “American Idol” and are shocked
when the judges tell them they can’t carry a tune.
At times I think I am plugged into the disability movement
through my connections and feeds I get for blogs and other news sources and
then I read something only to find out that something has been out there for a
while and I tell myself “Whoa were did that come from?”
I had been reading about changes to the DSM (look at last
month’s blog) and I missed this.
This piece was published in Disability Scoop.
“After Criticism,
DSM Committee Changes Course” by Michelle Diament
"Experts behind the new version of the Diagnostic and
Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders didn’t back down on major changes to the
definition of autism, but appear to have made an about-face when it comes to
intellectual disability.
Initial plans to revise the diagnosis of “mental
retardation” in the forthcoming fifth edition of the psychiatric manual called
for the condition to be renamed “intellectual developmental disorder.” Critics blasted
the proposal because it was inconsistent with the more commonly accepted term
“intellectual disability” which has already been adopted in many federal and
state laws.
Now it appears that the American Psychiatric Association
heard the complaints. In newly-released documents, officials from the
psychiatrists’ group stopped short of revealing the final text for the manual,
but now say the version slated for publication in May will replace “mental
retardation” with “intellectual disability.” The move is an effort to align
with the American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities,
the U.S. Department of Education and other groups, the psychiatric association
said.
The new term with be appended with a notation about
“intellectual developmental disorder” in order to be congruent with language
expected in an upcoming revision of the International Classification of
Diseases, or ICD, a guide to diseases and disorders published by the World
Health Organization.
“I’m really pleased that at least in the United States we
won’t have a conflict in terminology,” said Margaret Nygren, executive director
and CEO of AAIDD, who objected to the psychiatric association’s initial plan.
The new DSM will also bring changes to the criteria for the
diagnosis of intellectual disability, with less emphasis on a person’s specific
IQ score and more consideration for clinical assessment.
“The updated criteria will help clinicians develop a fuller,
more accurate picture of patients, a critical step in providing them with
effective treatment and services,” according to a fact sheet released by the
psychiatric organization.
The alterations to the "mental retardation" diagnosis came largley in the shadow of changes to the way that autism is defined withing the DSM. Despite significant criticism, those behind the new version of the manual did not waiver on plans to eliminate Aspergers's syndrome and fold it as well as childhood disintegrative disorder and persasive developmental disorder, not otherwise specified under the umbrella term "autism spectrum disorder."
Friday, January 25, 2013
Schools Directed to Provide Sports for Students with Disabilities.
I just heard today driving to work listening to NPR that the
Department of Education is creating a Title 9 program for individuals with
disabilities in publically funded schools.
This is absolutely cool. Please
read the NPR news spot.
This is indeed great news.
Wednesday, January 16, 2013
It’s here….
Well the legislative session is upon us and before it comes out of the gate we hear “Olympia we have a
problem”. The Senate is now run by a new
coalition.
Here is an excerpt from The Olympian article written by Brad
Shannon and Jordan Schrader “Washington’s Legislature opened its 105-day
session Monday with a bit of friction in the Senate but few fireworks.
Two Democrats defected from their party as expected, joining
23 Republicans to vote themselves into power in the state Senate. The group
elevated one of the rebels, Rodney Tom of Medina, to the top post of majority
leader and the other, Tim Sheldon of Potlatch, to the largely honorary position
of president pro tempore.
They aren’t the only Democrats who will play roles in the
new-look Senate. Members of the new minority will keep control of two
committees, and Des Moines Sen. Tracey Eide will share power atop the
influential panel that writes the state transportation budget.
“I think the Majority Coalition Caucus is a great opportunity
for like-minded legislators of both parties – regardless of party – to work
together,” said Sheldon, who will preside over Senate floor sessions in the
absence of Lt. Gov. Brad Owen, himself a former 35th District conservative
Democrat who bucked his party in the 1980s while in the Legislature.
Sheldon said the coalition is a “new model” for lawmakers.
“So many people that are partisan to the core want this effort to fail. And I’d
like to prove them wrong,’’ he said.
Other Democrats described the new power structure as a
“coup,” a “show-trial,” or “bipartisanship in name only.”
Well I guess we will need to see what develops over the 105
day session that needs to develop a 2013-2015 state budget and fill a 2 billion
dollar hole given a shortfall and the Supreme Court education decision that
directs the state to “fully fund” K-12 public education.
Amongst all this people with disabilities want
to be heard. In January is the 23rd
“The Community of People with Disabilities of Washington State Legislative
Reception”. The Reception is a way to meet with your
legislators and network with many people you may know or not. Hint before the reception you can call your
legislators and invite them to the Reception that is a great way to start your
relationships with your legislators. The
date is January 23rd from 5:30-7:30 p.m. in the Leg building Columbia
Room.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)